![]() |
LaMichael James and Oregon decimated Cal in 2009. |
Comparing football to other college sports, football has fewer games, so each game carries more importance, magnifying the impact of the blowout. Recruits are often at games, and a big loss can carry an adverse effect beyond just the present season. Alumni may make decisions to buy or not to buy season tickets for future seasons based on a particularly good win or bad loss. Fans tend to tolerate narrow losses, as you can point to a number of small factors that would have swung the game the other way. But the hopelessness that pervades a fan base after a blowout loss is a damaging element in any momentum a program might have. It's similar in politics, where a narrow loss in the Iowa caucuses for Rick Santorum (he actually won when votes were recounted) wasn't nearly as damaging as a huge loss was to candidates like Rick Perry and Michelle Bachmann. Santorum was able to stay in the race a lot longer because of how close he finished to Romney.
In other professional sports, like tennis, a blowout loss could be potentially very damaging, like say, if Roger Federer lost 6-1, 6-2, 6-0 to Rafael Nadal in a major final, it might permanently alter the landscape of power. Though, if Federer bounced back in a tournament a few weeks later by beating Nadal, some of the mental damage would be mitigated.
In any case, the simple stat I'd like to throw out is this: In the first seven years of Jeff Tedford's tenure as head coach, Cal lost by 20 points or more one time. Since 2009, the Bears have dropped 10 games by 20-plus points, including Saturday's 49-27 loss at Rice-Eccles Stadium to Utah.